Welcome to my musings on whatever topic catches my eye, plus stories, recipes, handyman tips, welding, photography, and what have you. Oh, and analog/digital hardware design, and software. Please comment on the blog post so everyone who visits can see your comments.

Year: 2007 (Page 5 of 11)

To All Who are Studying U.S. Presidential Candidates:

YouTube is an excellent place for “candidate surfing”. Most of the candidates and as well as other politicos (Nancy Pelosi, for example) have their own channels where they post things of their choice, but more interesting are the videos posted by users. You can review all of the debates captured off network TV, listen as many times as you wish, and listen carefully to what the candidates are really saying. Many campaign as well as prior speeches by politicians and candidates are also there on YouTube for you to examine closely.

Just go to YouTube and search on candidate names or keywords such as debate. Note that you will also find plenty of videos expressing opinions on every political topic, which you may or may not find interesting, but there’s tons of stuff showing the candidates speaking for themselves.

Here are some clips to get you started:

Clips from the Democratic debates:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaCxDs5weso
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un0Up0mY8Hg

28 minutes from the GOP debates:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3ze9sFkSoE

Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNvoaGfwZcc

And there’s lots more up there.

The Bank Overdraft Scam


Back in the good old days before so-called “overdraft protection”, if a large check arrived that would overdraw your checking account, it was simply returned NSF (Non-Sufficient Funds) and a fee of $10 or $15 was deducted from your balance. But the rest of your funds in the account remained there, able to cover smaller checks or charges that arrived. Nowadays with “overdraft protection” if a large check arrives, it gets paid, a $35 fee is charged, and your account gets driven negative, and now, every single additional check or charge that arrives is guaranteed to “overdraw” and trigger another $35 fee. Each little three dollar charge get’s hit with another $35.

But I still haven’t gotten to the nasty scam part. Back in the old-days, checks and charges were handled during nightly processing in the order in which they arrived or in random order. But now, with the “overdraft protection” scheme in place, the order in which checks and charges are processed suddenly matters a lot. A new “game” is possible for the bank. So banks these days keep a temporary ledger in their computers that records transactions as they occur during the day. This temporary ledger is what you see when you do online banking. But then during the night when the computers reconcile all the accounts, the temporary ledger is ignored and all of your transactions for the day are re-executed in the real ledger. The transactions are not handled in the order they occurred during that day, instead they are sorted by dollar amount and the largest transaction is entered first, then the next largest, and so on. This is done in to maximize the number of overdraft fees that might occur.

For example, let’s say on the morning of a particular day I have a balance of $150. During the day I use a debit card to buy a snack for $5, gas for $30, lunch for $10. During the day, if I checked my balance with online banking, my balance would have gone from 150 to 145, to 115, to 105. When I get home that afternoon I know that the three debit card transactions for the snack, gas, and lunch are done, safe, paid, right? Wrong!

Let’s say that during this same day two checks also arrive at the bank to be paid, one for $12 and one for $140. Uh oh, the $140 check is going to bounce, right? Wrong. The checks will get processed at midnight but so will all your previous transactions that day. All five transactions will be re-processed into the main ledger at midnight and not in the order of occurrence but in order of decreasing dollar amount. First comes the check for $140, which clears fine because your balance was still $150, driving the balance to $10, then the $30 debit card transaction, driving the account to $-20, plus the $35 overdraft fee to $-55. Then the 12, the 10, and the 5, each of which invokes another $35 fee. The next day my $150 positive account balance has become overdrawn by $187. Congratulations, you’ve just been hit with the bank scam.

Back in 2004 this happened to me with Suntrust Bank in Florida. A $40 check I had overlooked triggered a chain reaction resulting in $175 in bank fees. I called customer service and asked them to remove the so-called “overdraft protection” and simply bounce any future checks that would overdraw. Nope, can’t do it. The “overdraft protection” feature, which they tout as a great favor to their customers, is mandatory and cannot be disabled.

And if you think my story is bad, read some of these experiences with Citizen’s Bank:

http://asdfhj.com/citizens-bank-overdraft-fee-scam/86

This is a big gravy train the banks have going here. No wonder they show record profits. But in my opinion it meets the definition of fraud: “A deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain.” Even worse, this practice harms the poorest members of society the most since they are the most likely to overdraw their accounts.

Daylight Saving Time Redux

Well the poll is over. I’m sure the sample is too small to have any statistical significance, and the sample population was surely biased, but the outcome is interesting to me anyway. Eight people voted. Two people said they like daylight saving time and six do not. If nothing else, I know that I am not entirely alone in my dislike of DST.

Thank you all so much for participating!

If my blog drew a lot of traffic, I think it would be fun to do a simple poll of all presidential candidates from both parties. But at this point I think I have fewer readers than there are candidates running so that wouldn’t work. Haha.

What is the Matter with George W. Bush?

Regardless of whether you agree or disagree with Bush’s politics, it is very disturbing to compare the George W. Bush of 1994 with the same man 10 years later. In 1994, Bush was a capable debater, speaking freely, smoothly, with a good vocabulary, and in long complete sentences. Everything he said made sense. And I’m not talking about whether you agree with what he said or whether what he said was true, I am talking about his ability to smoothly string thoughts together into a logical sentence. Today, the simplest of concepts foul him up and his memory seems to have failed. It’s truly astonishing to compare his performance in 1994 with the same man after 2002. They don’t even seem like the same person.

The following video clip begins with a segment from the 1994 Texas gubernatorial debates. I would be shocked to turn on the radio today and hear President Bush speaking like he does in this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0vEJneflBw

So what happened? You don’t have to be a doctor to see that something has gone seriously wrong, but what? Any doctors or psychiatrists want to chime in with ideas?

Here are a couple more videos of the man who holds the most powerful political office in the world:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqLvBUSJucg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whhbPVrb5KM

shuttersparks

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 Shuttersparks

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Find me on Mastodon